In Search of Paradigmatic Diversification in Academic Finance

Main Article Content

Sheikh Tanzila Deepty
Saud Ahmed

Abstract

Academic finance research is largely overshadowed by functionalist paradigm, and this limit positive contribution to knowledge. Hence, finance literature faces criticism, which highlights the justification of having a diversified philosophical stance. By investigating contemporary papers on investment benchmarks, sustainable finance and behavioural finance, we identify that modern finance researchers are rethinking about the research paradigm to bring paradigmatic diversification rather than being stagnant to positivism.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

In Search of Paradigmatic Diversification in Academic Finance. (2021). Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies, 42(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbst.v42i1.59960

References

Aliyu, A. A., Bello, M. U., Kasim, R., & Martin, D. (2014). Positivist and non-positivist paradigm in social science research: Conflicting paradigms or perfect partners? Journal of Management and Sustainability, 4(3), 79–95.

Ardalan, K. (2000). The academic field of finance and paradigm diversity. Southern Business Review, 26(1), 21–31.

Ardalan, K. (2001). On the role of paradigms in the field of finance. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal.

Ardalan, K. (2003). Money and academic finance: The role of paradigms. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(6), 720–740.

Ardalan, K. (2008). On the role of paradigms in finance. In Alternative voices in contemporary economics. Ashgate.

Ardalan, K. (2010). Economic dimension of globalisation. Journal of Globalization Studies, 1(2), 41–67.

Bailey, J., Richards, T. M., & Tierney, D. E. (1990). Benchmark portfolios: Concept and design. Harper & Row.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–557.

Bettner, M. S., Robinson, C., & McGoun, E. (1994). The case for qualitative research in finance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 3(1), 1–18.

Broby, D. (2017). Investment benchmarks: Their ontological and epistemological roots. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(2), 46–49.

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Heinemann.

Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. Sage.

Conover, C., Broby, D., & Cariño, D. (2013). Introduction to benchmarks. CIPM Reading. CFA Institute.

Cousin, G. (2005). Case study research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 421–427.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Crotty, M. (1998). Foundations of social research. Allen & Unwin.

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100.

Darman, U., Ubud, S., Siti, A., & Khusniyah, I. N. (2017). The interpretive paradigm in finance research: An overview of behavioral finance. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 65(5), 162–167.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.

Findlay, M., & Williams, E. (1980). A positivist evaluation of the new finance. Financial Management, 9(2), 7–17.

Frankfurter, G. M. (2006). The theory of fair markets (TFM): Toward a new finance paradigm. International Review of Financial Analysis, 15(2), 134–144.

Frankfurter, G. M., & McGoun, E. G. (1999). Ideology and the theory of financial economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 159–177.

Gray, D. E. (2013). Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). Sage.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1996). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Hirschman, E. C. (1986). Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: Philosophy, method, and criteria. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(3), 237–249.

Kat, H. M., & Brooks, S. (2001). The statistical properties of hedge fund index returns and their implications for investors. Cass Business School Research Paper.

Kisely, S., & Kendall, E. (2011). Critically appraising qualitative research: A guide for clinicians more familiar with quantitative techniques. Australasian Psychiatry, 19(4), 364–367.

Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2014). La finance solidaire: Un humanisme économique. De Boeck.

Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2015). Diversifying finance research: From financialisation to sustainability. International Review of Financial Analysis, 39, 1–6.

Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2019). Sustainable finance: A critical realist perspective. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 1–9.

Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. Routledge.

Lehmann, B., & Modest, D. (1987). Mutual fund performance evaluation: A comparison of benchmarks and benchmark comparisons. The Journal of Finance, 42(2), 233–265.

Lintner, G. (1998). Behavioral finance: Why investors make bad decisions. The Planner, 13(1), 7–8.

Markowitz, H. (1968). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. Yale University Press.

Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case of qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5, 491–500.

Muradoglu, G., & Harvey, N. (2012). Behavioural finance: The role of psychological factors in financial decisions. Review of Behavioral Finance, 4(2), 68–80.

Olsen, R. (1998). Behavioral finance and its implication for stock price volatility. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(2), 10–18.

Olsen, R. A. (2001). Professor Burrell’s proposal for a behavioral finance: Some reflections. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 54–56.

Outhwaite, W. (1987). New philosophies of social sciences: Realism, hermeneutics and critical theory. Macmillan.

Plack, M. M. (2005). Human nature and research paradigms: Theory meets physical therapy practice. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 223–245.

Rao, S. (2019). The philosophical paradigm of financial market contagion research. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 12(3), 278–295.

Ricciardi, V., & Simon, H. (2000). What is behavioral finance? The Business, Education and Technology Journal, 2(1), 26–34.

Rosenau, P. M. (1991). Post-modernism and the social sciences. Princeton University Press.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson.

Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. Sage.

Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage.

Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to methodology and methods. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 9–16.

Shefrin, H. (2000). Beyond greed and fear: Understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. Harvard Business School Press.

Siegel, L. (2003). Benchmarks and investment management. CFA Institute.

Sultana, F. (2020). Paradigm shift and diversity in finance. Journal of Finance and Accounting Research, 2(1), 97–116.

Thaler, R. H. (Ed.). (1993). Advances in behavioral finance. Russell Sage Foundation.

Tight, M. (2010). The curious case of case study: A viewpoint. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4), 329–339.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.

Walter, C. (2016). The financial logos: The framing of financial decision making by mathematical modelling. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 597–604.

Weir, K. (2013). Methodological dominance in academic finance: The case of behavioural finance. Centre for Philosophy and Political Economy Working Paper, University of Leicester.

Williams, P. F. (2003). Modern accounting scholarship: The imperative of positive economic science. Accounting Forum, 27(3), 251–269.

Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2010). Exploring critical realism as the theoretical foundation of mixed-method research. Working Paper Series, Cambridge Judge Business School.

Zaman, A. (2013). Logical positivism and Islamic economics. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 21(2), 1–18.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.